KAJAMA.COM NEWSLETTER

    • Ghost Hunting vs. Paranormal Investigation

      by Richard Southall

      (Article originally published in The Llewellyn Journal.)

      When I started to investigate the unknown in the 1980s and 1990s, paranormal investigations and ghost hunting were not taken too seriously by most of our society. Back in the day, when a person on the street was asked about his or her knowledge and opinion of the paranormal, images from movies such as Poltergeist and Ghostbusters would often come to mind.

      To be honest, this mindset is still held by a small portion of our population to this day. Although nearly thirty years old and considerably outdated, Ray Parker Jr.'s Ghostbusters and the theme from the show The X-Files are still occasionally played as introduction music when a credible guest is interviewed about the paranormal.

      Of course, there were some of us who have always taken the paranormal very seriously. Those of who knew about the reality of the paranormal persisted and held true to our beliefs. Finally, our voices began to be heard and people started to listen.

      Since the late 2000s, the public's perception of the paranormal has evolved to the point that it has become socially acceptable and in some cases even en vogue to believe in things otherworldly. According to a 2005 Gallup Poll, approximately 32% of the general population believe in ghosts. National polls in different countries have yielded similar results. Not too shabby.

      I believe that this paradigm shift is absolutely fascinating as it gives paranormal enthusiasts a sense of credibility that was really not there in the past. I'd have to think that the Internet, social media, and television shows such as Ghost Hunters or Ghost Adventures have brought ghost hunting out of the shadows and has made it an accepted part of our mainstream culture.

      However, I've noticed that a small number of people have simply jumped on the bandwagon and have started to "ghost hunt" without having any real understanding of the paranormal. A smaller number still will use a "paranormal investigation" or "ghost hunt" as an excuse to party, trespass, and vandalize. Sadly, this type of irresponsibility and ignorance has occasionally had devastating results. Just think of the tragic end to Lebeau Plantation in Arabi, Louisiana. In 2013, a group of people went "ghost hunting" while under the influence of drugs and alcohol accidentally caught the antebellum mansion on fire, burning it to the ground.

      I think that we as paranormal enthusiasts should unite together in order to make certain that the general public understand what ghost hunters and paranormal investigators do, how they do it, and, more importantly, why they do it. In order to do so, I think that it would be useful to make a distinction between ghost hunting and paranormal investigation.

      At first glance, the terms "paranormal investigation" and "ghost hunting" appear to be interchangeable, used to describe the active study of paranormal events that take place at different locations. However, with years of experience in the field, I believe that there are some minute but important differences between ghost hunting and paranormal investigation.

      What Is Paranormal Investigation?
      As the name implies, paranormal investigation is simply the investigation and study of events that mainstream culture would define as "paranormal." As I have said in previous articles, blogs, and radio interviews, the vast majority of a paranormal investigation does not actually take place at a haunted location. Most of the time spent conducting a paranormal investigation involves doing research.

      When I conduct an investigation, I tend to srpend the first part of an investigation learning as much history as possible about a location that is allegedly haunted. This would include researching names of people, important dates, significant events, and other facts about the location. When I have gathered enough information about a location, I would then collect rumors, legends, or any related information that may lead some to believe that a location is haunted. Finally, I will search for eyewitnesses to any paranormal activity. This is actually easier than a person would expect, since most often the people experiencing a haunting are seeking me out. Needless to say, this process can take some time if done properly.

      Once I have gathered and researched this information, then I will generally make a visit to a haunted location. Although I tend to remain open-minded, I try to look at things realistically and rationally. I don't want to simply jump to conclusions; just because there are rumors and legends that a place is haunted does not necessarily mean that it is haunted.

      This point is where I believe that paranormal investigations really can get exciting. A person can still bring all of the interesting technology along to along to capture an EVP or photograph of the ghost. Technology is essential to an investigation, but it is important to remember that there is more to the investigation than simply relying on the technology. It is used to support the hypothesis as to whether or not a location is haunted, one piece of a much larger puzzle. That being said, there is nothing more exciting and than to be able to satisfying than to trace EVP or apparition back to a particular person.

      To give you an idea of how paranormal investigation has influenced our society, think of Gray Barker's book They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers or John Keel's The Mothman Prophesies. Barker and Keel both meticulously researched information from a large went through a variety of sources (interviews, newspapers, etc.), which allowed them to weave together stories have influenced several aspects of our culture. Think of the movies Men In Black and The Mothman Prophesies. Without Keel's and Barker's thorough dedication into properly investigating their respective topics, these stories would likely have not endured over the years.

      What Is Ghost Hunting?
      Ghost hunting has a slightly different flavor than paranormal investigation. As mentioned earlier in the article, the paranormal and especially ghost hunting have received a great deal of positive attention recent years. Although research of a haunted area is conducted prior to the ghost hunt, it is sometimes not conducted to the same extent as with a paranormal investigation. I feel that sometimes the main focus of the ghost hunt is for the people to have a fun and scary experience while in an area that is believed to be haunted. There is nothing wrong with that. To be honest, some of my most memorable scrapes with the paranormal have been on ghost hunts.

      Some ghost hunters rely heavily on technology to gather proof of a haunting. This is all well and good, but sometimes a person can have the tendency to focus too much on the technology that they often overlook some the bigger picture. Think about a person who sees the ocean for the first time but is so concerned about capturing it on film that they miss the entire experience. I've seen it happen all too often.

      If a person relies heavily on listening for EVPs or over-analyzing a photograph, there is the danger of finding something that really isn't there. This phenomenon is known as pareidolia, or finding a familiar visual or auditory pattern in some stimulus that is not really present. Sometimes, a shadow in a photograph isn't an apparition of a ghost. Sometimes, it's just a shadow.

      That being said, there have been many, many legitimate examples of convincing anecdotal evidence collected during a ghost hunt. Some of the most impressive examples of EVPs and photographs have been captured by people simply going through an area that is believed to be haunted.

      Another difference between paranormal investigation and ghost hunting is that ghost hunting can often be considered more of social event than paranormal investigation. Several businesses have sprouted throughout the country that offers "ghost hunts," especially around Halloween. Ghost hunts are often accompanied with some publicity or fanfare. Paranormal investigations are usually more low-key with only a few participants.

      So, Is One Better Than the Other?
      Although there are a few subtle differences between ghost hunting and paranormal investigation, I am not going to say that one is better than another. In fact, I think that the two can complement one another quite nicely. I know of paranormal groups that have ghost hunts for the public and conduct paranormal investigations for private individuals. In essence, they can provide the best of both worlds for those interested in ghosts.

      A ghost hunt conducted by a group of responsible friends or under the supervision of a tour guide will allow some people the opportunity to know what it is really like to search through a haunted area. For some, a one night trek by flashlight through an abandoned asylum or prison is quite enough to quench their thirst for the unknown. These people would likely enjoy ghost hunting immensely.

      However, there are those of us who want to know the who, why, when, where, and how of a place that may be haunted. People of this mindset will likely be more inclined to enjoy conducting paranormal investigations.

      Article originally published in The Llewellyn Journal. Copyright Llewellyn Worldwide, 2015. All rights reserved.

      Continue reading →
    • Double Vision: What's the difference between psychic and psychotic?

      guidedimagery

      Can you explain the differences between psychic and psychotic characteristics? Many spiritual advisers claim that they hear, see, and even smell things as a result of their connection to the spirit world. These can also be indications of a chemical imbalance in the brain. What is your take on this? Do you have any advice on how to determine if someone is psychic or crazy when looking for a spiritual adviser? How do you think mental health professionals should approach clients who have psychic experiences?

      Dreamchaser:

      Since I can hear, see, and even smell things as a result of my connection to the spirit world, I think most people who can do the same are not crazy. Then again, I could be crazy. Joking aside, I am glad you asked this question.

      I can’t describe the difference between a psychic and a psychotic episode because I am not a psychiatrist. I can’t offer up scientific proof that anything I hear, see, or even smell is real and not stemming from a chemical imbalance.  What I can say is that for many years now, I have had the same clients coming over and over because what I hear, see and otherwise perceive is incredibly accurate, or has deep meaning for them.

      I know that many individuals the world has revered as prophets were also considered crazy by the people around them. In the Christian Bible, for example, Isaiah was such a great prophet that he was given his own book in the Bible, yet he was branded as insane and ostracized from society. Due to such stigma, for many centuries, the old ways had to be practiced in secret. Even today, anyone who does not follow a modern religion (like psychics, pagans, or Wiccans) is looked on disparagingly.

      I think in choosing an adviser, you should first look for someone with a good reputation. Psychic Chat has some very reputable advisers. It is an established site that has been online for a long time now. I think choosing someone here would be wiser than choosing someone named Madame Zora on the Strip while vacationing at the beach. Listen to word of mouth. If someone you know raves about a reading, ask who, what and where.

      Also, use your intuition. Your gut will guide you well if you let it. If it is churning and flipping, you know to run away from the person. If you feel relaxed and things just feel right, trust that feeling.

      I think medical professionals (mental health care providers included) should pay attention not only to modern advances, but also to age old wisdom. There is a fascinating book called “The Heart’s Code” by Doctor Paul Pearsall. He viewed life from a purely scientific standpoint until love and his family’s energy healed his inoperable brain cancer.

      Also, why does it matter what I can see, hear or even smell things others can’t, as long as my work helps people and produces positive results? Does it really matter if I can’t logically explain it to you or anyone else?

      I wish you continued enlightenment.

      *****

      Astrea:

      People who are psychic can also be psychotic, and vice versa. However, unlike some people, I don’t see the difference between genius and madness as a fine line. To me, there is nothing the two conditions have in common.

      Psychics know better than to tell just anyone what they feel or see. By contrast, psychotics will tell anyone about the impressions bombarding them. Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder may at times appear to have psychic overtones, but there are other behavior patterns present in individuals with those conditions that prevent them from optimally functioning in their daily lives.

      I don’t mean to say that being psychic doesn’t make a person feel crazy sometimes. We all wonder if we have some kind of brain abnormality when we first discover our abilities. The difference between knowing something and imagining things isn’t a very big gap. Being truly gifted is a matter of knowing the difference, however, and knowing it well.

      Some people hear things, some smell them, some feel them, and some see them, like me. Most of the time, it’s a combination. Everyone is born with psychic ability, even individuals who are psychotic or neurotic. Some of us learn how to work with our intuitive abilities, and some of us don’t.

      Abilities manifest in unique and special ways for each one of us; there is no one right or healthy way. The bottom line, however, is that a psychic finds a way to use her gifts in a positive way, and is able to control them. A psychotic is out of control and unable to control her thoughts and feelings. A good psychic is also able to remain objective about her visions in order to accurately interpret what she perceives.

      Someone struggling with psychosis can’t be objective and discerning because her right mind is not running the show. Her impressions and visions come to her randomly and without effort on her part. These messages may seem to be meaningless and random because this person is picking up psychic garbage in the atmosphere. Psychotics tend to be caught up in their own realities too – everything is about them – while psychics pick up messages and insights to help others.

      This level of control and awareness distinguishes psychics from psychotics. While someone with a chemical imbalance may sincerely believe they are talking to angels, God or Jesus, the quality of what they hear will reveal the truth.

      Continue reading →